Legal Opinion

DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO.1:20-CV-3446

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 8, 2024No. 3:20-cv-03446Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SALIL SHARMA, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Civil Action No, 20-3446 (RK) (RLS) □ MEMORANDUM OPINION VIJAY GUPTA, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Salil Sharma (“Sharma” or “Counterclaim Defendant”), (“Mot.,” ECF No. 71), seeking dismissal of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff’s Vijay Gupta’s (“Gupta” or “Counterclaim Plaintiff’) Counterclaim. (ECF No. 59.) Gupta filed a brief in opposition, (“Opp’n.,” ECF No.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API