Legal Opinion
Potts v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 21, 1995No. 94-1311-MLBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REID, United States Magistrate Judge.
On May 5, 1995, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file her first amended complaint (Doc. 33). A response was filed on May 19, 1995 (Doc. 37). No reply brief was filed.
Defendant objects to the proposed amendment for two reasons: (1) the motion is untimely, and (2) plaintiff seeks to add a Title VII sexual harassment claim which is futile. Plaintiff, inexplicably, has failed to respond to either of those arguments, and neither one is addressed in her motion. Counsel should be aware that the court will not construct arguments or theories for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Drake v. City of Fort CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Monument Builders of Greater Kansas City, Inc. v. American Cemetery Assn. Of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dartez (ID 87393) v. PetersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019