Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 24, 1996No. 161, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL E. ALPERT, Judge,

Specially Assigned.

There are three issues before the Court in this criminal appeal. They are:

1. Whether the trial court committed reversible error in admitting as an exception to the hearsay rule a third party’s confirmation of the key witness’s prior inconsistent statements.

2. Whether the trial judge should have declared a mistrial after the jury, over a period of several days, was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.

3. Whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the charge of murder.

Of central importance to our decision is the trial court’s allowance of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Di Carlo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. United States v. Albert GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corbett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Selective Way v. NationwideCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Curtin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Belton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Foreman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API