Legal Opinion

In re E. M. D.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1971No. 1524PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

In this appeal we are called upon to decide whether a minor who has been adjudged a child in need of supervision can be institutionalized under our children’s code.

Both Alaska’s statutes relating to children’s proceedings and the rules of procedure governing such proceedings establish three distinct categories of children. Thus, a child can be declared a dependent minor, a child in need of supervision, or a delinquent minor. AS 47.10.290(7) defines a “child in need of supervision” as a minor whom the court determines is within the provisions of AS 47.10.010(a) (2),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. BrowderAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Fish v. HornNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. In Re WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. P. H. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. E. L. L. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In re G. K.Alaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kerttula v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API