Legal Opinion

Waldo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided February 28, 1986No. 04-84-00120-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIAL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of murder. Defendant was found guilty by a jury which assessed his punishment at 99 years’ confinement.

Defendant first complains of the State’s use of his post-arrest, post-Miranda silence for impeachment. Following a motion to suppress hearing out of the presence of the jury the trial court cautioned the State’s witnesses not to refer to the defendant’s post-arrest silence. In the presence of the jury, in response to the question by the prosecutor “At which point what did you do,” Detective Tart testified as follows:

By…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cobarrubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Rohlfing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Waldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Martinez Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Joiner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Waldo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API