Waldo v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of murder. Defendant was found guilty by a jury which assessed his punishment at 99 years’ confinement.
Defendant first complains of the State’s use of his post-arrest, post-Miranda silence for impeachment. Following a motion to suppress hearing out of the presence of the jury the trial court cautioned the State’s witnesses not to refer to the defendant’s post-arrest silence. In the presence of the jury, in response to the question by the prosecutor “At which point what did you do,” Detective Tart testified as follows:
By…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cobarrubio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rohlfing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waldo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Martinez Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Joiner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Waldo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986