Legal Opinion
Farago Advertising, Inc. v. Hollinger International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 15, 2001No. 00 CIV. 8730(VM)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Farago Advertising, Inc. (“Far-ago Advertising”) has sued Defendant Hol-linger International, Inc. (“Hollinger”) for breach of contract in connection with the development of an advertising campaign in 1999. Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law (“PL’s Mem.”) at 7. The parties now cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, Farago Advertising’s motion for summary judgment is denied, Hollinger’s is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
BACKGROUND
In June 1999,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Mary Ellen Winston v. Mediafare Entertainment Corporation, Gallavants, Inc., and Ralph SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC. v. RhodesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Balta v. AYCO COMPANY, LPDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Baraliu v. Vinya Capital, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Golub v. Tanenbaum-Harber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- 136 Field Point Circle Holding Company, LLC v. RazinskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.