Legal Opinion
In Re McFeeley
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided February 22, 2007No. 06-10605PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION DENYING DEBTORS MOTION TO EXTEND STAY UNDER § 362(c) AND DETERMINING THE EXTENT OF THE STAY THAT IS TERMINATED 1
COLLEEN A. BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Mr. McFeeley (“the Debtor”) filed a chapter 13 case within one year of filing another chapter 13 case. He therefore finds himself in a position where the automatic stay generally available to debtors throughout the pendency of a bankruptcy case is subject to early termination under a new provision that became effective under 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) of the Bankruptcy Abuse Protection and Consumer Protection Act of 2005…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
- In Re JumppBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
- In Re JupiterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re BenderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- In re HaleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- In re GoodrichUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2018
- In re Scott-HoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
- In re RoachUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.