Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v. Lindley
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
R.C. 5741.02 provides, in pertinent part:
“(A) For the use of the general revenue fund of the state, an excise tax is *16hereby levied on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property, as follows: ***.” (Emphasis added.)
The fundamental question presented is whether the subject tanks constitute “tangible personal property” for purposes of taxation. While R.C. Chapters 5739 and 5741 do not specifically define real property or tangible personal property for purposes of taxation, R.C. Chapter 5701 does contain definitions applicable to the cause sub judice.
R.C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Zangerle v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Reed v. County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Shutter Bug, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Funtime, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Green Circle Growers, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Am. Natl. Can Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Dayton Press, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.