Cammack v. Watson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the District Court of Concordia, Owrry, J. Walter, one of ■the defendants, appealed from a judgment, rendered -on the verdict of a jury, in favor of the plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court wns pronounced hy
Eustis, C. J,*
The plaintiffs, at April term, 1839, in the District Court of Concordia, obtained judgment against, one of the defendants, Watson, for $10,000, with interest and damages. It was had on a judicial confession, in a suit which had been instituted against him as drawer of a 'bill of exchange. An execution was issued, and returned nulla bona, on the 20th of May, 1840.
On the 19th of May, 1841, the plaintiffs instituted this suit, in which they charge that Watson, on the 14th day of December, 1837, made a pretended sale of all his property in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hiriart v. RosesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
3Cited by2 opinions
- Olivier, Voorhies & Lowrey v. MajorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- Caster v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1941