Hiriart v. Roses
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT POR THE PARISH OP LAFOURCHE INTERIOR, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. This is an action by a creditor to annul certain sales from his debtor to the defendants, as having been made in fraud of creditors. The plaintiff shows that he obtained a judgment against Auguste Roger, in the parish of Lafourche Interior, on the 2nd October, 1835, for one thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, with interest and costs.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT POR THE PARISH OP LAFOURCHE INTERIOR, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. This is an action by a creditor to annul certain sales from his debtor to the defendants, as having been made in fraud of creditors. The plaintiff shows that he obtained a judgment against Auguste Roger, in the parish of Lafourche Interior, on the 2nd October, 1835, for one thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, with interest and costs. He further shows that his debtor, A. Roger, conveyed a lot of ground and a certain female slave, to one Mathurin Bourg, by acts sous…
1Opinion of the Court
Emsíís, J.
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff alleges, that on the 2nd of October, 1835, he obtained judgment against Auguste Roger, for the sum of *128one thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, with interest and costs; that the said judgment was rendered on a debt which existed prior to the date of the several conveyances of which he afterwards complains.
That on the 7th day of January, 1828, the said Auguste Roger conveyed a female negro slave named Eliza, then aged about eighteen years, to Mathurin Bourg, and on the 2nd day of October, in the same year, he conveyed to the said…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Vital v. AndrusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Bernard v. AugusteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
- Decuir v. VeazeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1853
- Cammack v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846