Legal Opinion

Hale v. Fawcett

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 4, 1974No. Record 730367PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtI'Anson, J.

Plaintiff, Dr. Blake Fawcett, instituted this action against the defendant, Joseph Franklin Hale, for damages to his corn crop and farmland allegedly caused by defendant’s trespassing hogs and cattle. Defendant filed an answer and counterclaim, alleging damage to his land and loss of feed caused by plaintiff’s trespassing bulls and steers.

During the course of the trial before a jury, the court below ruled (1) that since there was no “lawful” division fence on the line between the adjoining landowners, neither the plaintiff nor the defendant could recover for any damages done by livestock…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Graham Virginia Quarries, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  2. Heldt v. Elizabeth River Tunnel DistrictSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
  3. Smith v. Pittston CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Panther Coal Co. v. LooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Microstrategy, Inc. v. Business Objects, s.a.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Shepherd v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Little v. CookeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  4. Carr v. Citizens Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  5. Medcom, Inc. v. C. Arthur Weaver Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API