Legal Opinion
Heldt v. Elizabeth River Tunnel District
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided November 22, 1954No. Record 4258PublishedCited by 26 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.
Emma Heldt filed a motion for judgment against the Elizabeth River Tunnel District, Tidewater Construction Corporation, and E. Virginius Williams, trading as E. V. Williams Company, to recover damages to her property resulting from the construction of a tunnel for public use under the Elizabeth river, connecting the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth. The plaintiff alleged that the Elizabeth River Tunnel District had contracted with the Tidewater Construction Corporation and E. Virginius Williams to construct the tunnel, and that during the construction the contractors had negligently and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
- Panther Coal Co. v. LooneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
3Cited by26 opinions
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Hampton Roads Sanitation District v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Burns v. Board of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Kitchen v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Gray v. VIRGINIA SECRETARY OF TRANS.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.