In re Mead
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtUenROOt, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming- a decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 9 to 15, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent. Eight claims were allowed. Claims 9,10, and 11 are apparatus claims, and claims 12 to 15, inclusive, are for a process.
Claims 9 and 12 illustrate the subject matter involved and read as follows:
9. In a device of the character described,v means to suspend a burial vault in a grave with its upper edge near the surface of the ground and to lower it gradually, removable supports for…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- In re AshbaughCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Otto Henning v. Scott F. HuntCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.