Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Poplawski, R., Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2015No. 654 CAPPublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice STEVENS.

This is a capital direct appeal from the judgments of sentence imposed following convictions on three counts of first-degree murder and related charges entered in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgments of sentence.

On the morning of April 4, 2009, 21 year old Richard Poplawski (“Appellant”) was asleep in his Pittsburgh home when his mother, Margaret Poplawski, awoke him with a screaming complaint that their dogs were urinating and defecating on the living room floor. N.T. at 1391, 1447-48. The two argued bitterly…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RadeckiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. YandamuriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. GauseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. BeasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Commonwealth v. Hannibal, S., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API