Legal Opinion

Lieberman v. Cook

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KNOX, District Judge.

In this suit to recover amounts allegedly due under an Employees Profit-Sharing Plan, defendants have presented a Motion For Summary Judgment. Defendants present two defenses which are in the opinion of the court valid. First, that plaintiff has failed to state a claim under the Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act 29 U.S.C. 301 et seq. Second, that defendants are entitled to judgment on the merits because plaintiff has already pursued his remedies through common law arbitration and is not entitled to a second bite at the apple. There is no diversity…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Great American Insurance v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BarberaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. William H. Nolan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Richard B. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  2. Joseph W. Hales v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  3. Knauss v. GormanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Joseph W. Hales v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API