Legal Opinion
Knauss v. Gorman
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 28, 1977No. Civ. A. 76-456PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KNOX, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a retired butcher, has filed suit for pensions allegedly due him from the defendant pension fund. The pension applied for was denied by the trustees by reason of break in service (BIS) provisions of the fund. After the usual pretrial procedures the case was heard before the undersigned non-jury and is now ready for disposition on the merits. •
Plaintiff started work in 1936 for Oswald & Hess Company, a Pittsburgh meatpacker, an employer covered by the fund, in 1936 and worked there as a full-time employee until September 10, 1962 the company went out of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Alvares v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Handee T. Lee v. Robert NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- John Bowers, Etc. v. Ulpiano Casal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ruetta Paris, Mildred Cawthon and Marge Kane v. Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Howard B. Wolf, Inc. And Eugene K. FriesenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- William J. Riley v. Meba Pension TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- James J. Reiherzer v. Daniel J. Shannon, and Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Brink v. DaLesioDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1980
- Livolsi v. City of New Castle, Pa.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.