Legal Opinion
McHugh v. International Components Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Stanley Harwood, J.
Motion by second third-party defendant for summary judgment grounded on lack of jurisdiction is respectfully referred to Special Term, Part II, for hearing and determination. Second third-party plaintiff’s cross motion for discovery of jurisdictional facts is granted to the extent indicated.
The main complaint of Patrick McHugh is based on negligence, breach of warranty, and strict products liability; defendant, International Components Corp. (I.C.C.), is charged with selling a defective capacitor to plaintiff’s employer, Todd Products Corporation.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peterson v. Spartan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Bulova Watch Co., Inc. v. K. Hattori & Co., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Taca International Airlines, S. A. v. Rolls-Royce of England, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
- ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Public Administrator v. Royal Bank of CanadaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- King v. Best Western Country InnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Brandt v. Volkswagen AG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Luciano v. Garvey Volkswagen, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.