Legal Opinion

Arax v. Watershed Investments CA5

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 2, 2020No. F077056Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/2/20 Arax v. Watershed Investments CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MANE ARAX et al., F077056 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 16CECG03415) v. WATERSHED INVESTMENTS, INC., et al., OPINION…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Vallbona v. SpringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Lang v. HochmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API