Legal Opinion

PlayUp, Inc. v. Mintas

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 12, 2024No. 2:21-cv-02129Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 PLAYUP, INC. Case No. 2:21-cv-02129-GMN-NJK 5 Plaintiff, Order 6 v. [Docket No. 489] 7 LAILA MINTAS, 8 Defendant. 9 Pending before the Court is Defendant Laila Mintas’ motion to shorten time to rule on her 10 motion to extend the discovery deadline. Docket No. 489. The motion is, in reality a motion 11 requesting emergency treatment of the motion to extend. Id. 12 “The filing of emergency motions is disfavored because of the numerous problems they 13 create for the opposing party and the court resolving them.” Cardoza v. Bloomin’ Brands,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cardoza v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
  2. Mission Power Engineering Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1995
  3. Fisch v. GouldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  4. In Re Chicago South Shore & South Bend RailroadUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API