Legal Opinion

Starzenski v. City of Elkhart

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 25, 1996No. 95-1766PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Sophie Starzenski, Kazmer Starzenski, and Gennie Starzenski filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that the defendants violated their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by entering onto real property that they owned and seizing their personal property without a warrant. Additionally, Sophie Starzenski claimed that the Elkhart Police Sergeant Ernie Hill arrested her without probable cause and used excessive force to effect the arrest. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of all the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal; we…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Grieveson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. William K. Zimmerman v. Margarita Tribble, Craig Hanks and Edward L. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. Daniel Virnich v. Jeffrey VorwaldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. John Lanigan, Sr. v. Village of East Hazel Crest, Illinois, Officer Robert Wasek, Chief Ray RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Payne v. ChurchichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API