Arthur v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
Sometime prior to June 6,1943, respondent issued its policy of insurance agreeing to indemnify appellant against liability to third parties arising out of the operation of a fleet of trucks and trailers. Such insurance was to be effective only in the event that notice and proof of loss be served on respondent or its general agent as soon as practicable. On that date one of the trucks of appellant collided with an automobile belonging to one Byerly. The agents of appellant promptly took photographs of the scene of the accident, made a report of it and mailed it to Peter N. Williams, the broker…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Purefoy v. Pacific Automobile Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Strangio v. Consolidated Indemnity & Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Coy v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del NorteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Abrams v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- McFarlane v. Merit Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.