Clapp v. Guy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
In 1896 the plaintiff, who then resided and still resides in the town of Flushing, was elected a coroner in and -for the county of Queens for a term of three years from January 1, 1897. He duly-qualified and entered upon the performance of his duties. By the operation of the Greater Hew York charter (Laws of 1897, chap. 378) the town of Flushing has become a part of the city of Hew York, and is now included in the division of the city known as the borough of Queens. In 1897 the defendant was elected a coroner of this new borough for a term of four years from January 1,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hanrahan v. . Terminal Station CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Woodruff v. . PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Gough v. SatterleeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898