Hanrahan v. . Terminal Station Commission
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 18, 1912, in favor of defendants, respondents, upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The nature of the controversy and the facts, so far as. material, are stated in the opinion. The submission of the controversy between the parties was proper. (Admiral Realty Co. v. City of New York, 206 N. Y. 110; 76 Misc.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 18, 1912, in favor of defendants, respondents, upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The nature of the controversy and the facts, so far as. material, are stated in the opinion. The submission of the controversy between the parties was proper. (Admiral Realty Co. v. City of New York, 206 N. Y. 110; 76 Misc. Rep. 345.) The stipulated statement of controversy does not state facts constituting a cause of action, presents no actual…
1Opinion of the CourtChase, J.
This is an alleged controversy submitted without process pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. That section provides: ‘ ‘ The parties to a question in difference, which might be the subject of an action, being of full age, may agree upon a case, containing a statement of the facts, upon which the controversy depends; and may present a written submission thereof to a court of record, which would have jurisdiction of an action, brought for the same cause. * * * ”
By section 1280 of said Code it is provided that from the filing of the papers constituting the submission the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Admiral Realty Co. v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- People, Ex Rel. Woods v. . CrisseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- People v. Brooklyn, Flatbush & Coney Island Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- People Ex Rel. Simpson v. . WellsNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. . Beakes Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Bank of United States v. BravemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People Ex Rel. Hoesterey v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Town of Greenburgh v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.