Legal Opinion
Calvert v. Mayberry
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 8, 2019No. 16S413PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE BOATRIGHT delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 David Calvert was disbarred for various ethical violations, including entering into an oral agreement with a client without complying with the requisite safeguards of Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8(a). After being disbarred, Calvert sued his former client, Diane Mayberry, for breach of that same oral agreement, claiming that there was a contract between them. The trial court granted Mayberry's motion for summary judgment, and the court of appeals affirmed. Calvert now asks us to consider three questions related to this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Kempter v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Bailey v. Lincoln General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- WJC v. Hon. Scott C. WoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Baker v. RinconColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Baker v. Safadi-ChamberlainColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
- Calvert v. MayberrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Castillo v. Denver HealthColorado Court of Appeals · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.