Legal Opinion
Midborough Acupuncture P.C. v. State Farm Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 26, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order reversed, without costs, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied and defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint granted to the extent of directing that plaintiff shall respond to those discovery demands which seek information regarding whether plaintiff was fraudulently incorporated, within 30 days of the date of the order entered hereon or within such other reasonable time period as the parties stipulate to in writing.
In this action to recover $1,107.51 in first-party no-fault benefits for health care services rendered to its assignor,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Mary Immaculate Hospital v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lexington Acupuncture, P.C. v. General Assurance Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2012
- Allstate Insurance v. Valley Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Carothers v. Insurance CompaniesCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
- Allstate Ins. v. VALLEY PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHAB.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007