Legal Opinion

State v. Montes

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 2, 2019No. 20170286-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 Christopher Montes had already been held in contempt of court three times when he asked his appointed counsel, "[D]o I need to head-butt you so that the judge will give me a new lawyer?" Based on this statement and other actions of Montes, the trial court ruled that Montes had impliedly waived or forfeited his right to counsel and would be required to represent himself. Montes soon repented, and his lawyer represented him for the rest of the trial, but not before opening statements and two significant witnesses had testified. Now convicted, Montes appeals. Because we…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. State v. BunkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. State v. LuckeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025
  4. State v. HorrocksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API