Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re Anonymous No. 114 D.B. 98
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 5, 2000No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 114 D.B. 98Published
1Dissent
DISSENTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CUNNINGHAM III, Member,
December 5, 2000— The report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Board is that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.1 I am writing in dissent to recommend that respondent be disbarred.
*349The board bases its recommendation on In re Anonymous No. 67 D.B. 92, 27 D.&C.4th 202 (1994). However, that case concerns an attorney who victimized one client. The instant case is more like Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Passyn, 537 Pa. 371, 644…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Penn-Air, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KneppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.