Legal Opinion

Tarango DeForest Padilla v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2014No. 41772, 41773PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge.

Tarango Deforest Padilla appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his amended petition for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Specifically, Padilla contends that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we vacate and remand.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In Twin Falls, a street runs north to south (the Street) and the Street is intersected by an alleyway that runs east to west (the Alley). 1 At approximately 2:30 a.m. in August 2009, a Twin Falls police officer was in his…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Tarango Deforest Padilla v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API