Tarango DeForest Padilla v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge.
Tarango Deforest Padilla appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his amended petition for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Specifically, Padilla contends that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to file a motion to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we vacate and remand.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In Twin Falls, a street runs north to south (the Street) and the Street is intersected by an alleyway that runs east to west (the Alley). 1 At approximately 2:30 a.m. in August 2009, a Twin Falls police officer was in his…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Higgins v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
- Tarango Deforest Padilla v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016