Legal Opinion
Lidsky v. Lidsky
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Matthew F. Coppola, J.
In this case of apparent first impression, plaintiff husband moves, pendente lite, for an order directing defendant wife to execute any documents necessary to secure refinancing of the loan on marital premises held by the entirety.
*512The salient facts are unopposed. Plaintiff is presently in possession of the home and paying all expenses thereof. The home was purchased in 1980 at the prevailing mortgage interest rate of 15%. With a present mortgage balance of $44,000 his monthly payment of principal and interest is $555.36. Refinancing at the anticipated…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Fearon v. TreanorNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Kahn v. KahnNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Leibowits v. LeibowitsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Phillips v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nederlander v. NederlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Sedgh v. SedghNew York Supreme Court · 1989
- Shammah v. ShammahNew York Supreme Court · 2008
- Harlan v. HarlanNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Nederlander v. NederlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013