Shammah v. Shammah

OPINION OF THE COURT

Vito M. DeStefano, J.

The plaintiff, represented by counsel, moves for an order “appointing and authorizing the Plaintiff to sell the real property owned by the parties at 953 N. 6th Street, New Hyde Park, New York and to execute any and all documents necessary to effectuate said sale.” Simultaneously filed with the motion was a summons and complaint in which the plaintiff asserted three causes of action alleging the following: that the defendant breached a separation agreement entered into in October 20071 “by failing to cooperate with the real estate brokers, by failing…