Legal Opinion
Robertson v. Cartinhour
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 17, 2010No. Civil Action 09-01642 (ESH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendant/counter-plaintiff Cartinhour’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. In particular, Cartinhour seeks $5267.50 in fees related to three filings by plaintiff/counter-defendant Robertson: 1) the motion to quash Cartinhour’s subpoena to Charles Schwab [Dkt. 43]; the motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order granting Cartinhour leave to amend his counter-complaint [Dkt. 56]; and 3) the counter-counter-complaint [Dkt. 53].
The Court finds that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Juan E. Cruz v. Robert Savage, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Liddle & Robinson v. Kidder Peabody & CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Bombardier Corp. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Robertson v. CartinhourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robertson v. CartinhourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Robertson v. CartinhourDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Acosta v. District of Columbia GovernmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Jordan v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021