Legal Opinion

Marquise Investment, Inc. v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 2010No. 2507 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge BUTLER.

The City of Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh City Council (collectively, the City) appeal the November 23, 2009 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) granting the conditional use application filed by Marquise Investment, Inc. (Marquise). The issue now before the Court is: whether the burden of proving that there was no harm to the health, safety and welfare of the community shifted back to Marquise (1) where medical professionals testified that the location of a proposed adult cabaret would adversely affect the recovery of the members of a nearby…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. In Re Appeal of McGlynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Sunnyside Up Corp. v. City of Lancaster Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Aldridge v. Jackson TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams Holding Group, LLC v. Board of Supervisors of West Hanover TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Appeal of Richboro CD Partners, L.P.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Allegheny Tower Associates, LLC v. City of Scranton Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. EQT Production v. Boro of Jefferson Hills, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Allegheny Valley Railroad v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API