Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Fujitsu Business Communication Systems, Inc.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 24, 1993No. 1:06-adr-00016PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DiCLERICO, Acting Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Gary L. Alexander (“Mr. Alexander”) and Yvonne Alexander (“Ms. Alexander”) have filed this action against defendants Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc. (“Fujitsu”), Fujitsu America, Inc. (collectively, the “corporate defendants”) and William R. Miller (“Mr. Miller”). Plaintiffs’ complaint is in four counts: misrepresentation, intentional interference with Mr. Alex ander’s employment, violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) and loss of consortium. Plaintiffs have alleged jurisdiction over the corporate…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Alternative System Concepts, Inc. v. Synopsys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Preyer v. Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Donovan v. Digital Equipment Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Gilbert v. Essex Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
  5. Edes v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API