Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Chattanooga Publishing Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided January 8, 2014No. 1:12-CV-252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CURTIS L. COLLIER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Chattanooga Publishing Company’s (“CPC”) motion for summary judgment (Court File No. 31). CPC argues Plaintiff Debra Dunn (“Dunn”) has failed to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination, failed to exhaust her administrative remedies with respect to her accommodation claim, otherwise sought an unreasonable accommodation, and CPC in fact accommodated her disability. Dunn responded in opposition to CPC’s motion (Court File No. 33) and CPC replied to Dunn’s response (Court File No. 35). The Court concludes…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. Planned Parenthood of Greater OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  2. Hendershott v. St. Luke's HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API