Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Diaz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 29, 2009No. 2 CA-CR 2008-0051Published

1DissentHoward, Judge

II16 I must respectfully dissent. Diaz has failed to carry his burden to show that fundamental error occurred because, he claims, he was deprived of the required twelve-person jury. He relies solely on the transcript of the jury poll, which omits juror number six from the poll.

¶ 17 Diaz did not object to the alleged absence of a juror below and bears “the burden of persuasion” to show that fundamental error occurred. State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, ¶ 19, 115 P.3d 601, 607 (2005). The statement from State v. Avila, 217 Ariz. 97, ¶ 12, 170 P.3d 706, 709 (App.2007), does not shift or lessen…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Buzard v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Palmer v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API