Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Randle
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 14, 2012No. 11-2962PublishedCited by 810 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
In a pro se complaint filed on March 15, 2011, Raul C. Gomez alleged various First and Eighth Amendment violations by the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC”) and Stateville Correctional Center prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court appointed counsel for Gomez and allowed him to proceed in for-ma pauperis. Gomez’s attorney met with him in person on one occasion and thereafter filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. In that motion, the attorney stated his belief that Gomez’s claims were either barred by the statute of limitations or not warranted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Plymouth Ambulance ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Bridges v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by810 opinions
- Shawn Eagan v. Michael DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- James Donald v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Juan McGee v. Carol AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- John McCottrell v. Marcus WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Monwell Douglas v. Faith ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
805 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.