State v. Carey
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentGarfield, Chief Justice
I am convinced the trial court’s judgment is right and should be affirmed.
No one questions that an accused is entitled to a fair trial. I think this defendant was accorded such a trial.
It should not be lost sight of, however there are two parties to a criminal case and that the State as well as the defense is entitled to a fair trial. We have fre*37quently pointed this out. State v. Haffa, 246 Iowa 1275, 1283, 71 N.W.2d 35, 40, cert. den. 350 U.S. 914, 76 S.Ct. 198, 100 L.Ed. 801; State v. Case, 247 Iowa 1019, 1030, 75 N.W.2d 233, 240; State v. Kelly, 249 Iowa 1219, 1222, 91 N.W.2d 562, 564;…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- State v. DanaWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Shover v. Iowa Lutheran HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
- Hackman v. BeckwithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- State v. JensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Daniels v. BloomquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.