Legal Opinion
Stull v. Buetler
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 9, 2021No. 3:20-cv-02067Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON BARRY JOE STULL, Case No. 3:20-cv-2067-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v. JAKOB BUETLER, et al., Defendants. __________________________ RUSSO, Magistrate Judge: Pro se plaintiff, Barry Stull, brings this action alleging violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and his civil rights. Defendants have filed motions to dismiss. Plaintiff has not filed any pleadings or responses beyond an application requesting in forma pauperis status. Instead, plaintiff submitted letters to the Court which, other than implying a need for additional time…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.