Legal Opinion

Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. M. Mitshkun Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 89PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Defendant bought goods of plaintiff which were charged to it in a ledger account, so-called. It also received goods, five boilers, on consignment, which were charged in another account, called consignment account, and which were covered by a written contract, containing usual provisions relative to risk of damage by fire or other cause, report of sales, settlement, etc. The part of the contract here important may be said to be:

“It is further understood and made a part of this agreement that any engines and boilers or other goods shipped to you on consignment and not sold (or reported sold) at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moline Plow Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. Furst Bros. v. Commercial BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. National Bank v. GoodyearSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Wiggins v. TumlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. In re PierceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Auch v. Washtenaw County SheriffMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API