Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 23, 2002No. A02A1095PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

This is a direct appeal of the trial court’s interlocutory order denying Stanley C. Bolden’s motion for discharge and acquittal based on the alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Bolden was arrested on March 14, 1997, for driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent it was less safe for him to do so, a violation of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a). He was tried and convicted on August 20, 1997. This Court affirmed Bolden’s conviction. However, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the solicitor improperly bolstered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Boseman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Callaway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Beasley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Carolyn Allen Doxey v. Mark D. CrisseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API