Legal Opinion

United States v. Kim

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1978No. Nos. 76-3705, 76-3704, 77-1209, 76-3664, 76-3665, 77-2283 and 77-2320PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants appeal from a judgment dismissing their antitrust complaint against Union Oil Company of California (“Union”). The district court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter because the complaint failed to state sufficient facts to demonstrate that the challenged activities had sufficient impact upon the flow of interstate commerce to permit appellants to invoke the Sherman Act, Sections 1 and 2 (15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2). Appellants contend that the complaint stated more than adequate facts to establish that the acts complained of occurred within the flow of interstate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. Women's Sportswear Manufacturers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Jiles, Anthony, EliecerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. PlunkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. William ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Larry Dean KiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API