Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. Co. v. Eshelman

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 26, 1914No. 29PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Southern Pacific Company against John M. Eshelman and others, constituting the Railroad Commission of California, and others.

1Opinion of the Court

VAN FLEET, District Judge.

This is a bill seeking to restrain the Railroad Commission of the state, its attorney, and certain other officers charged with the enforcement of the Public Utilities Act of the state (St. Cal. 1911 [Ex. Sess.] p. 18), approved December 23, 1911, from asserting the right to enforce, as against plaintiff, a nonresident corporation engaged as a common carrier by railroad in local and interstate commerce in this and various other states, the provisions of that act in certain respects. Stated in a briéf and very general way, the particular transaction counted upon as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Little v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CopelandTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Lewis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. State v. RodgersTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Macklin v. Kaiser Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API