Legal Opinion
John Tarkowski v. Robert Bartlett Realty Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 2, 1980No. 76-1269PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a final judgment under Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing all but two of the one hundred and thirty-seven defendants named in plaintiff’s pro se Second Amended Complaint. 1 We will not try to improve on the district court’s summary of the numerous injuries attributed by plaintiff to efforts of his neighbors to limit his use of his land. Most of the defendants were dismissed for lack of federal jurisdiction. The remaining claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the Lake County State’s Attorney and the Assistant State’s Attorney…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- Spencer Harris v. Ronald Fleming, Larry Frailey and Walter BreischkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Briscoe v. LahueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Lopez House v. Scott BelfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- E & T Realty v. StricklandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.