Legal Opinion

Ewart v. Ewart

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1919No. 10,371PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, ■ Judge. Action by Daniel Oliver Ewart against Anna B. Ewart and others. Prom a judgment' for plaintiff, the defendant named appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Appellee David Oliver Ewart filed his complaint in the Huntington Circuit Court against his coappellees and the appellant to quiet the title to an eighty-acre tract of land in Huntington county: The defendants, including the appellant, answered separately in general denial. There was a trial, which resulted in special findings of fact, and conclusion of law in favor of appellee David Oliver Ewart. Appellant duly excepted to the conclusion of law, and, after motion for a new trial, which was overruled, judgment was entered in favor of appellee David Oliver Ewart,- quieting the title to said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Cameron v. ParishIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hayes v. MartzIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Curry v. CurryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Logan v. SillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vaubel v. LangIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Kramer v. KramerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Franklin College v. WolfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Wible v. HuntIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Slater v. Akron Exchange State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API