Legal Opinion

Slater v. Akron Exchange State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1943No. 27,859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

Judgment was against appellant upon his refusal further to plead after demurrer to his complaint was sustained. The only question in this appeal is the construction to be given Item 2 of Truman C. Slater’s will which reads:

“ITEM 2. I will, devise and bequeath all my property of which I may die seized or possessed, be it real, personal or mixed, and wherever situated, after said Item 1 of this will has been complied with, to my beloved wife, Emma A. Slater, to have and hold all of the same, as her sole and absolute property forever upon this express proviso that in event there is any property,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulvane v. RudeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Baker v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Stimson v. RountreeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ewart v. EwartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Kramer v. KramerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franklin College v. WolfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Gamester v. MASSEY, ADMR. ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API