Commonwealth v. Riley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
The instant appeal arises from the revocation of appellant’s probation. Appellant raises several arguments to bolster his contentions that the hearing court lacked the power to revoke his probation and impose a prison sentence and that the court, even if it had such power, abused it by relying extensively upon hearsay evidence proffered by appellant’s probation officer. 'While we agree with the Commonwealth that the hearing court could validly revoke appellant’s probation, we agree with appellant that the court erred in relying upon hearsay evidence in exercising its power in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. KatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Grello v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. Del ConteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BallardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.