Legal Opinion

United States v. Diehl-Armstrong

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 2010No. 1:07-cr-00026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court in this matter is the Defendant’s Motion for Change of Venue and Venire and for the Sequestration of Jurors, as set forth in her omnibus pretrial motion [143]. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied without prejudice to be reasserted at the time of voir dire.

I. BACKGROUND

At approximately 2:28 p.m. on August 28, 2003, an individual by the name of Brian Wells entered the PNC Bank at 7200 Peach Street in Erie, Pennsylvania and, after selecting a lolly-pop from one of the teller stations,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. Kelvin Williams (071306)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. State v. GribbleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  4. United States v. WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
  5. Lam Luong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API