Legal Opinion

Ardolino v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a declaratory judgment action, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hyman, J.), entered May 26, 1982, which denied his motion for summary judgment and granted *781defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that “11 NYCRR 65.6 (p) (4) (iii) is valid and that defendant’s offset of amounts recovered from Social Security by plaintiff’s wife and children was lawful”. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The only issue before us on this appeal is whether section 65.6 (subd [p], par [4], cl [iii]) of the regulations promulgated by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Karmilowicz v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NalboneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NalboneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  4. Thompson v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API