Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 27, 2009No. 07-1573, 07-1576, 07-1574, 07-1575PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

The four appellants in this case, Brad Williams, Seville Williams, Clinton Williams, and Rory Tucker, were charged with committing a series of armed robberies over a four month period. Four other individuals who were involved in the robberies pled guilty and testified against the defendants at trial. All of the defendants were convicted and appeal their convictions.

Rory Tucker raises several challenges to his conviction and sentence. We reject his first argument regarding improper joinder of defendants because the indictment properly charged Tucker and the other…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Alfonso Velasquez, Ramon Dominguez, Esmerido Galvan Olamendi, Ramon Gomez, and Armando GomezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. HosseiniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Michael ValloneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API