Legal Opinion

Schiewe v. Farwell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1993No. 20216Published

1Dissent 1

McDERMOTT, J. Pro Tern.,

dissenting.

I respectfully depart from the authored opinion of Justice Linda Trout and would affirm the opinion of the Court of Appeals.

From 1970 to 1987, Schiewe and her husband, now deceased, farmed the property which is at the center of this litigation. Those initial years were pursuant to a five year written lease which was never renewed. Thereafter the Schiewes remained on the land as a permissive hold-over tenant on a year-to-year basis. For the better part of seventeen years the Schiewes made their livelihood from this land. Their initiative and productivity…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bistline.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Tommerup v. Albertson's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hoffman v. SV Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API